Critics say that any bailout creates a moral hazard. Moral hazard comes from the insurance industry, where people might gain financially by acting immorally. Regarding the mortgage mess, moral hazard might result from risk-takers realizing that they can take unlimited risk - and depend on the regulators or their lender to bail them out.
We've seen a few lenders shut their doors or lay off employees. These events undoubtedly create strain and hardship for anybody involved. Likewise, borrowers lose their home when they default on a mortgage. The regulators have to walk a fine line - do they allow the suffering to continue or do they perform a rescue and risk moral hazard?
Further reading:
- WSJ on Moral Hazard and the Fed

